Glad you've enjoyed following along. Your question is an important one. This is something I looked at closely as I was developing the system. After all, if the portfolio isn't generating alpha, then you would indeed be better off just taking the timing signals and buying a proxy for a broad index, or perhaps a leveraged ETF.
I just posted (above) a history of model portfolio returns for each period where a timing signal was thrown. Where the timing signal is BUY or NEUTRAL, the portfolio is invested in stocks and is either in a market neutral stance, or net-50%-long.
Pay special attention to the "excess returns" column, which shows the returns that can be attributed to alpha mostly as a result of stock selection.
For 43 months this blog tracked a "live test" of the Strategic Growth Model portfolio. This real-time test commenced in January 2008 and ended in August, 2011, with all trades posted in advance.
The purpose was to demonstrate that a systematic approach to investing can yield exceptional returns in all market conditions. More information about the system may be found at the bottom of this page.
is a private investor; developed the Strategic Growth Model portfolio. Over the past 8 years, this systematic approach has been validated over a full Bull-Bear market cycle.
Matt,
ReplyDeleteGlad you've enjoyed following along. Your question is an important one. This is something I looked at closely as I was developing the system. After all, if the portfolio isn't generating alpha, then you would indeed be better off just taking the timing signals and buying a proxy for a broad index, or perhaps a leveraged ETF.
I just posted (above) a history of model portfolio returns for each period where a timing signal was thrown. Where the timing signal is BUY or NEUTRAL, the portfolio is invested in stocks and is either in a market neutral stance, or net-50%-long.
Pay special attention to the "excess returns" column, which shows the returns that can be attributed to alpha mostly as a result of stock selection.