Saturday, April 30, 2011


Returns for week ending 4/29/11

Past week:
Model portfolio - hypothetical return: -0.5%

Value of $10,000 invested in model portfolio at inception in 2003: $62,688

NOTE: For the first time, the holdings for next week show the "new and improved" Strategic Growth Model.

Monday, April 25, 2011

The new and improved Strategic Growth Model

This chart shows the hypothetical performance of the new and improved Strategic Growth Model portfolio, since inception in May 2003 through April 22, 2011, including its performance during the different phases of the intermediate cycle (BUY-NEUTRAL-SELL).

The "old" model is shown for comparison, as is a 100% hedged model with no market timing, and the benchmark S&P 500 index.

The new model uses the crucial pillars of the retired model... the exact same stock selection criteria and the same timing model. The only change is in the way the timing model drives the portfolio's allocations to stocks, cash and inverse funds in alignment with prevailing market conditions.

The result is a model portfolio that has far greater weekly returns, more than compensating for an increase in its weekly volatility. It is largely uncorrelated with the market, even showing gains during the bear market of 2007-09. As I'll explain in another post, the timing model also greatly assists in managing the risk of a significant interim loss before the portfolio goes on to attain a new high water mark.

Enough for now.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Note from Steve

While the model portfolio's "full cycle" performance since the market top in October 2007 is impressive (+63% vs -17% for the S&P 500), its performance since the historic market bottom (Spring 2009) has significantly lagged the market, which has been extremely frustrating. In this note, I'll pass along some findings from my recent post performance analysis, and explain some changes I'll be making to the model portolio to hopefully improve its overall performance going forward.

First, I'm reassured from my analysis that the model is again showing that it has the ability to consistently select stocks that will outperform the market. Consider the chart, which shows the "stock only" performance (no hedge) in my ACTUAL trading account for the 12 months ending April 22, 2011. As you can see, the stocks selected for the model portfolio have gained 42.5% while the S&P 500 has gained 11% over the same 12 month period, nearly a 4:1 advantage. These "excess returns" are consistent with the model portfolio's performance since inception in 2003.

The exception was the 12 month period immediately following bottom made in Spring 2009, where the stocks selected by the model significantly underperformed the benchmark index. The model was simply out-of-phase with the market during this period. Why? ...because the model selects growth stocks that are expected to outperform the market in a "normal" rally where money chases growth, whereas the 2009-2010 rally period was led by a bounce-back in large financial stocks that had been severely punished as the financial system unraveled. The model simply isn't designed to select down-trodden stocks... rather it selects high performing growth All-Stars, which happened to underperform the broader market during the 12 month period ending April 2010. This was a highly unusual period following a historic panic fueled decline, and now that money is again chasing growth, our model stocks are out performing the benchmark index.

Going forward you'll see some changes. First, I'm removing the hedge (TWM) from the model portfolio. Even without the hedge the model is uncorrelated with the stock market. e.g. the model has shown to have less than a 30% correlation with the market since inception, which is about as good as it gets. The portfolio's allocations will range from "100% long" to "50% short" depending on market conditions.

To drive the portfolio's long/short allocation, I'll continue to use the same third party timing model I've been using for years... the DecisionPoint Thrust / Trend Model (TTM). Google it if you'd like a detailed description. I've analyzed dozens of market timing algorithms and this is by far the BEST I've ever seen. Importantly, it enabled us to neatly side step the severe market decline in 2008-09 and also correctly got us on the right side of the market in early 2009 as the market began to rise from the ashes.

The TTM gives us three types of intermediate term signals which will drive the allocations:

BUY - 100% long
NEUTRAL - 50% long, 50% cash
SELL - 50% short

Going forward, I'll continue to post the hypothetical "Model Portfolio" stock selections and allocations, and I'll begin posting the ACTUAL weekly performance in my trading account rather than hypothetical model portfolio returns. This will make it easier to track your performance against what is actually achievable rather than what is theoretically achievable. You should be seeing less tracking error as a result.

Enough for now.

Saturday, April 23, 2011


Returns for week ending 4/22/11

Model portfolio, hypothetical returns for past…
1 week: +1.5%

Value of $10,000 invested at inception in 2003: $63,007

Monday, April 18, 2011


Returns for week ending 4/15/11

Model portfolio, hypothetical returns for past…
1 week: +1.0%

Value of $10,000 invested at inception in 2003: $62,101

Sunday, April 10, 2011


Returns for week ending 4/8/11

Model portfolio, hypothetical returns for past…
1 week: -0.4%

Value of $10,000 invested at inception in 2003: $61,525

.

Saturday, April 2, 2011


Returns for week ending 4/1/11

Model portfolio, hypothetical returns for past…
1 week: +2.5%

Value of $10,000 invested at inception in 2003: $61,763

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Sunday, March 13, 2011


Returns for week ending 3/11/11

Model portfolio, hypothetical returns for past…
1 week: -1.6%

Value of $10,000 invested at inception in 2003: $57,567

Sunday, March 6, 2011



I've been traveling extensively and will post performance data later.

Since May of last year, the model stocks have greatly outperformed the S&P 500 by approximately 2 to 1. However the hedge against the small cap stocks (TWM) has negated that gain. As a result, at least one of our investors have removed a portion of the hedge by carrying a smaller weighting of TWM resulting in a portfolio that is approximately 2/3 model stocks and 1/3 TWM all the time.

I have begun doing the same for my managed portfolios. At some point I will re-run the model since inception using this allocation and post the results. Until then I will continue posting the results for the model portfolio as shown.